Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:30
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
This email app is Gmail on steroids, and I can't recommend it enough - Android Police
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Boulder County resident exposed Flatiron Flyer passengers to measles - The Denver Post
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Buzz Williams on what Maryland's playing style will be, learning the Big Ten and more - 247Sports
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Yankees lose no-hit bid on controversial check swing call - New York Post
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear: